Is 200-store retailer Petland a leader in the fight against inhumane puppy mills, or the nation’s largest puppy mill customer?
Is owning a Petland store “an exhilarating and rewarding experience” made possible by an “experienced team of professionals” or a blatant scam run by a company promoting a doomed investment for its own gain?
The dog fight that’s developing between Petland and its detractors would make Michael Vick squeamish.
The Humane Society Claims Petland is “the nation’s largest retail supporter of puppy mills”
The Petland franchise chain is America’s largest chain of puppy-selling pet stores, with 200 stores in 31 states and several foreign countries. Petland claims to be an advocate for animal welfare and a leader in the fight against inhumane “puppy mills.”
The Humane Society of the United States tells a different story, claiming that Petland Inc. is “the nation’s largest retail supporter of puppy mills.” On their website, they provide a video showing puppy mill cruelty and asking supporters to write to Petland to ask them to stop selling puppies altogether.
Petland Claims The Humane Society of the US is Lying
Petland counters with claims of their own on the Petland website, accusing HSUS of using unrelated footage to attack Petland: “Petland is outraged that HSUS would intentionally use video footage of unrelated kennels in the report to try to mislead the general public into believing these facilities have a connection to Petland.”
Further, it accuses of the HSUS of misleading consumers and donors into thinking it is the parent organization of all local humane societies when, in fact, “they are NOT, and very little support in the form of dollars, actually makes it to the local level.”
Petland claims that when it comes to animal welfare, it is part of the solution.
Failed Petland Franchisees Are Also on the Attack
According to the Petland franchise website, when you become a Petland franchisee, “The Petland corporate staff has one focus: your success. From the president to the receptionist, everyone’s job is rooted in the support of the strategic partners.”
However, former Petland Inc. franchisees are suing the Ohio-based franchisor for fraud, alleging that the business model doesn’t work, that the stores are doomed from the start, and they sell them anyway.
According to a recent BizJournal story:
Columbus-based Luper Neidenthal & Logan and two New York firms filed a suit on behalf of two lead plaintiffs – franchisees in Nashville, Tenn., whose stores have gone out of business. The suit is seeking class-action status on behalf of all franchisees since November 1993, and asks for relief of about $20 million. It also seeks cancellation of franchise agreements, said Greg Melick, a Luper Neidenthal attorney representing the plaintiffs.
Melick estimates the average investment per franchisee totals up to $250,000, and the firms have been in contact with more than 40 franchisees.
The lead plaintiffs claim Petland fraudulently induced them to start a pet store when it knew, or should have known, the shops couldn’t succeed. A major allegation from franchisees, Melick said, is that pets supplied to the stores through Petland’s vendors were sick or dying.
Melick compared the franchisees’ problem to a restaurateur opening a new business and sending dozens of people to the hospital for food poisoning in its first weekend.
“For a large group of these franchisees, sick puppies is a problem when they open,” he said. “You just can never recover.”
This battle is just getting started and will, undoubtedly, be both public and messy… bad news for the franchise owners of those 200 stores.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
__________________________
FEATURED STORY:
TanWorld: Creating the Next-Generation Tanning Salon Franchise
OVERVIEW Interview with Tanworld V.P. Bob McQuillan
Visit FRANBEST’s: Unbiased franchise information, franchise interviews and detailed, searchable information on 400 franchise and business opportunities.
.
Franchisees, customers & experts vote for their favorite new franchises at Top New Franchise: Who’s hot. Who’s not.










Previous Post

On August 31, 2008 we purchased a Papillon puppy from Petland. It was lethargic on the first day, and we thought it was just all the new home excitment. The next day it began coughing, so we took it for the “free” initial visit at the vet recommended by Petland. They diagnosed Kennel Cough. Within a few weeks the dog was perking up.
However, as soon as she began eating and drinking regularly, she began urinating ALL the time. She urinates when she is walking, sitting on your lap, playing with the kids…. The vet told us it a “behavioral issue.” After two weeks of this, I demanded that the vet do something. It turns out that there is something wrong with the puppy.
The puppy has been to the vet about once a week at the cost of $100 to $400 a visit. The vet has made no diagnosis and is now accusing us of being “irresponsible pet owners” because we can’t afford anymore tests. Petland refuses to pay any portion of the vet bills stating that the issue “is not genetic.”
In summary, we purchased a $1200 purebred Papillon (and now that is in question as well) that is unable to be a member of the family. The puppy is “quarantined” in our kitchen so that it does not destroy our carpets or infect out other pets (or even our children?).
I think it is irresponsible of Petland to have sold us a sick puppy and then take no responsibility for getting the animal healthy. We have contacted an attorney and await a response on how to proceed.
I trust the Humane Society on this one.
I’m against dogs and cats being sold in stores of any kind. There are too many shelter animals that need homes already.
1245 days ago
[...] at franchise website FranchisePick.com (PETLAND: Who’s the Sick Puppy Here?), the 200-unit Petland franchised pet chain is under attack both from failed franchisees who allege [...]