Since the 1960s, the 4Ps of marketing theory have been famous, mostly through their publication in Kotler’s ‘Principles of Marketing’. However, Brian Fetherstonhaugh of OgilvyOne has suggested in the company’s latest bulletin that we should no longer look at 4Ps but 4Es.
In case you’re not familiar with the theory, the 4Ps are:
- Product
- Placement (or distribution channel)
- Price
- Promotion
The marketing mix defined by the 4Ps was created before the rise of computers and the internet, before globalisation was an integral part of our lives. So it’s no wonder that there is a growing push for marketing theory to prove it still applies in the same way.
Fetherstonhaugh suggests the following changes:
Product becomes Experience
Instead of focussing on a singular benefit to consumers, we should create stories and experiences, ie. branding. Creating a feeling lasts longer and is harder to replicate by competitors.
Place becomes Everyplace
Previously, distribution channels were set places and all traffic was directed there. Fetherstonhaugh argues that marketers need to be ‘everyplace’ that their customers are.
Price becomes Exchange
This recognises that the purchase of a product isn’t just an exchange of financial benefit, but also includes goodwill.
Promotion becomes Evangelism
Promotion is a one-way process: marketers talk, consumers listen. As discussed here, you want the people using your product to be talking about it – not just to you, but to the rest of the world.
So, do you agree that this is the new direction for marketing? Check out the full article here and tell us what you think!










Previous Post
I like the model presented here. Who is Brian Fetherstonhaugh of OgilvyOne, please? I just want to establish his authority as one of my theorists in the paper that I am writing. Thanks.
Victor
1248 days ago
[...] concepts of branding and marketing are changing. I remember in my MBA courses learning about the 4 P’s of marketing – Product (what you’re selling), Price, Place (distribution), and Promotion (advertising and [...]
i like this 4p->e thing.
The theory definitely seems closer to what is really happening right now! Even if it will be regarded as a different angle when explaining the 4Ps by some, it should clearly be taken into consideration.