<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss">

<channel>
	<title>EveryJoe &#187; the taking of pelham 123</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everyjoe.com/tag/the-taking-of-pelham-123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everyjoe.com</link>
	<description>Sports and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Now Playing: “The Taking of Pelham 123”</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/now-playing-%e2%80%9cthe-taking-of-pelham-123%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/now-playing-%e2%80%9cthe-taking-of-pelham-123%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denzel washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john travolta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the taking of pelham 123]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the taking of pelham 123 trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the taking of pelham one two three]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everyjoe.com/?p=72794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taking of Pelham 123 opens in theaters across North America today.  The film has a decent cast which might be enough to overcome this incredibly awkward title (yes, I know it’s a remake of the original 1974 film adaptation but the title is still very cumbersome).


The movie stars Denzel Washington as Walter Garber, a New York City subway dispatcher/chief detective of the Transit Authority.  He seems to be having a fairly routine day until armed men hijack the Subway... <a href="http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/now-playing-%e2%80%9cthe-taking-of-pelham-123%e2%80%9d/">More &#187;</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1111422/">The Taking of Pelham 123</a></em></strong> opens in theaters across North America today.  The film has a decent cast which might be enough to overcome this incredibly awkward title (yes, I know it’s a remake of the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072251/">original 1974 film adaptation</a> but the title is still very cumbersome).</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://cdn.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-2-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="the taking of pelham 123_2" width="504" height="337" /></a></p>
<p>The movie stars <strong>Denzel Washington</strong> as Walter Garber, a New York City subway dispatcher/chief detective of the Transit Authority.  He seems to be having a fairly routine day until armed men hijack the Subway 6 train and demand $10 million in ransom for their safe release.</p>
<p>I have read that it was a bit of a challenge to bring this movie’s plot up to date since there have been amazing advancements in technology since 1974.  My first thought was that people would be able to have access to cell phones, GPS, text messaging and laptops along with the more advanced safety features you would expect to find on public transportation today.  While I felt that those could be potential drawbacks in the storyline, I realized that similar things could be employed to actually enhance the plot since modern hostage-takers have access to a far greater number of resources and tools.  If this is done correctly, it could be a decent enough film but early reviews have been mixed with most media outlets assigning the movie a score that hovers around 50%.  It makes me wonder why this movie was remade at all in the first place.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-1.jpg"><img src="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-1-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="the taking of pelham 123_1" width="149" height="101" /></a><a href="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-3.jpg"><img src="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-3-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="James Gandolfini in Columbia Pictures' action thriller THE TAKING OF  PELHAM 123, starring Denzel Washington and John Travolta." width="149" height="101" /></a><a href="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-4.jpg"><img src="http://everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123-4-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="John Travolta stars in Columbia Pictures' action thriller THE TAKING OF  PELHAM 123, also starring Denzel Washington." width="149" height="101" /></a></p>
<p>As I mentioned earlier, the cast is quite strong.  In addition to Washington, <strong>John Travolta</strong> takes on his first action role in a decade (as the leader of the hijackers) and, while I want to be optimistic, I think that his styling and image looks a little ridiculous.  I couldn’t tell if they were trying to make him look tough or younger (or both) but whatever the objective, it appears to have failed.  Travolta and Washington are joined by <strong>James Gandolfini</strong> (as the mayor of NYC) and <strong>John Turturro</strong> (as a lieutenant with the NYPD).</p>
<p>I also question whether audiences will want to watch a movie about hijackers/terrorists in New York City after everything that happened there on September 11, 2001.  The panic caused by that <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/air-force-one-backup-rattles-new-york-nerve/">unauthorized White House photo-op in Manhattan</a> a couple months ago is a sign that people are still on guard (and who can blame them?).</p>
<p>Maybe I’m being too hard on it but I will say that it’s probably a good thing that <em>Pelham’</em>s only real competition at the box-office this weekend is the equally questionable <em><a href="http://everyjoe.com/articles/coming-soon-%e2%80%9cimagine-that%e2%80%9d/">Imagine That</a></em>.  Watch the trailer:</p>
<div class="vidembedwrap"><object width="640" height="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o1MXoV1XyLE&ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o1MXoV1XyLE&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480"></embed></object></div>
<p>images: Columbia Pictures</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://everyjoe.com">EveryJoe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/now-playing-%e2%80%9cthe-taking-of-pelham-123%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.everyjoe.com/files/2009/06/thetakingofpelham123poster.jpg" width="146" height="104" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

