The Houston Astros have signed second baseman Kaz Matsui to a three-year deal worth $16.5 million. Matsui hit .288/.342/.405 with the Colorado Rockies in 2007, and before that spent time with the New York Mets.
In his four-year career, the 32-year-old Matsui owns a .272/.325/.387 batting line. He also has never played more than 114 games in a season, so the question remains, why did the Astros feel compelled to lock him up to a long-term deal?
Pros:
- Good defender
- Great in postseason (too bad the Astros went 73-89 last year and don’t figure to improve by a lot)
Cons:
- On the wrong side of 30
- Not much of a hitter
If I were the Astros, I’d have given Chris Burke the job. I know, Burke can’t hit either, but at least he’s cheap.










Previous Post
Yeah, you would think. It’s a head-scratcher to me as well.
Wouldn’t the Astros be better off just letting Chris Burke play every day? Can he not put up similar numbers to Matsui with about 1/4 the salary?
I mean he was a first round pick. I figured now that Biggio retired he’d finally get a full season. Guess not.