<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewatching LOST: 3.23 &#8220;Through the Looking Glass, Part 2&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/rewatching-lost-3-23-through-the-looking-glass-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/rewatching-lost-3-23-through-the-looking-glass-part-2/</link>
	<description>Sports and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/rewatching-lost-3-23-through-the-looking-glass-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-199877</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.approachinglost.com/?p=4798#comment-199877</guid>
		<description>Robbin, that’s a great insight as to the Others. I’ve always tried to reconcile the divergence in how the Others have been portrayed, and your idea of an intentional shift makes it more clear. I suspect Darlton and co. are also reflecting currently prevalent philosophical theories about engaging with “the Other” and coming to see his or her humanity the more we get to know him or her.

I’ve got to disagree with you, on the other hand, regarding LOST’s shift after season 3. We’ve certainly had great episodes: The first eight or so episodes of season 4 together (up until Rousseau’s death) reached the show’s quality and artistic peak to date, and season 5’s finale was the best of any season ender, IMHO. But many other episodes found the show focusing on plot, mysteries, and action at the expense of character, and the show often lost what either Carlton or Damon once called LOST’s genius — that it’s as much about characterization as it is about plot or mysteries. And it’s primarily in the characterizations where we end up focusing on the show’s primary themes: redemption, fate vs. free will, religion vs. science, etc.

I’d even argue that many of the mysteries have already been explained satisfactorily. For just one example, the central role of Smokey with respect to the show’s primary theme of redemption has already been made clear, I think: to cause people to evaluate their lives and in some way be judged. Everything else except for who has controlled Smokey (for the record, I’m betting it is a neutral Cyberus-like watchdog/Island security system that has been employed to both good and evil ends over the course of the show) is mildly interesting but ultimately superfluous to me—Smokey’s origins can stay a mystery, as far as I’m concerned. I’m ultimately satisfied with a mystery’s status if its role in relation to the show’s central themes — and particularly that of redemption — has been explained sufficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robbin, that’s a great insight as to the Others. I’ve always tried to reconcile the divergence in how the Others have been portrayed, and your idea of an intentional shift makes it more clear. I suspect Darlton and co. are also reflecting currently prevalent philosophical theories about engaging with “the Other” and coming to see his or her humanity the more we get to know him or her.</p>
<p>I’ve got to disagree with you, on the other hand, regarding LOST’s shift after season 3. We’ve certainly had great episodes: The first eight or so episodes of season 4 together (up until Rousseau’s death) reached the show’s quality and artistic peak to date, and season 5’s finale was the best of any season ender, IMHO. But many other episodes found the show focusing on plot, mysteries, and action at the expense of character, and the show often lost what either Carlton or Damon once called LOST’s genius — that it’s as much about characterization as it is about plot or mysteries. And it’s primarily in the characterizations where we end up focusing on the show’s primary themes: redemption, fate vs. free will, religion vs. science, etc.</p>
<p>I’d even argue that many of the mysteries have already been explained satisfactorily. For just one example, the central role of Smokey with respect to the show’s primary theme of redemption has already been made clear, I think: to cause people to evaluate their lives and in some way be judged. Everything else except for who has controlled Smokey (for the record, I’m betting it is a neutral Cyberus-like watchdog/Island security system that has been employed to both good and evil ends over the course of the show) is mildly interesting but ultimately superfluous to me—Smokey’s origins can stay a mystery, as far as I’m concerned. I’m ultimately satisfied with a mystery’s status if its role in relation to the show’s central themes — and particularly that of redemption — has been explained sufficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/rewatching-lost-3-23-through-the-looking-glass-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-199785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.approachinglost.com/?p=4798#comment-199785</guid>
		<description>One other thing about Jack&#039;s flash forward that really showed how much his mental state had detiorated, is how he told Dr. Hamil to call his father, when his father is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing about Jack&#8217;s flash forward that really showed how much his mental state had detiorated, is how he told Dr. Hamil to call his father, when his father is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

