Just in from Ausiello:
(Warning – spoilers from tonight’s episode!! And my thoughts are after the quote…)
If you’re still in denial about the horrific turn of events on tonight’s Prison Break, well, stop reading, ’cause a stone-cold reality check is coming your way: That was definitely Sara Trancedi’s decapitated head staring up at Lincoln from that box. No ifs, ands or red herrings about it. Michael’s long-suffering soul mate is dead and she ain’t comin’ back.
Breathe in. Breathe out. Breathe in. Breathe out. And now prepare yourself for another sobering piece of news. Yes, my friends, it gets worse. The sad truth is, it didn’t have to end this way. It wasn’t supposed to end this way.
As Prison Break executive producer Matt Olmstead explains in this exclusive interview, the violent nature of Sara’s death was the culmination of long and fruitless negotiations between the show and new-mom Sarah Wayne Callies. It’s enough to make your head spin. (Sorry. Poor taste.) Stick around after the Q&A for Callies’ response. And then feel free to assign blame wherever you feel it’s warranted.
Last January, after it was announced that Sarah was pregnant, your colleague, Paul Scheuring, assured fans that he had no intention of killing off her character. What changed?
Matt Olmstead: What changed is that our initial pitch to the network was [rejected], so we had to go back to the drawing board. I remember we were sitting in the room thinking, “How do we unlock Season 3, motivation-wise?” Since we’re not a procedural, we have to keep everyone moving forward. We have to evolve. And given what Michael’s been through, how do you keep him going? And then it was tossed out, “What happens if Sara gets killed as an extension of what we already had planned for Season 3?” We knew that would work. But clearly it was a big conversation. And when we pitched the network, they wanted to know if there was any way we could avoid that, because everyone loved Sarah’s work. But in order to make the season work, we really didn’t have any other motivation for Michael. We determined that this was the right thing to do in order to really jolt the series.Did you ever stop to consider that this might be a slap in the face to fans who had invested two years in the Michael-Sara relationship?
Olmstead: We took everything into consideration. Our initial idea was to have [Sarah/Sara appear in] the first 13 episodes, so she and Michael could have a proper goodbye. There were going to be some really emotional scenes where he tried to save her from dying, but she ultimately passed. So then we whittled it down to 11 episodes, then 10 episodes, then nine episodes, then four episodes…. Then we suggested flying to her — she was pregnant [at the time] and living in a remote part of Canada — and bringing a camera crew to her house, but that wasn’t accepted. We then whittled it down to just a phone conversation, and that was turned down, too. We were really looking forward to paying off that relationship. But [when] it became evident that that wasn’t going to happen, we made lemonade out of a lemon.
So, as a result, you were forced to kill her off sooner than you had planned?
Olmstead: Much sooner. We used the story to our advantage in that she was being held hostage. [Sarah] was gracious enough to let us use her image, which really helped. I totally get it, personally. She was, at the time, pregnant and living in a remote part of Canada and nesting; [she] kind of looked at the options and didn’t want to go forward. No hard feelings whatsoever. The show is an ensemble. The show moves forward. There are very few untouchable actors on the show.
Wasn’t Sarah under contract? Didn’t she have to return?
Olmstead: That’s a business-affairs question.[At this point, 20th Century spokesperson Chris Alexander interjects: "We had to either pick her up for the entire season of 22, according to her contract, or we had to make a new contract with her. We determined in May that we didn't plan to use her for the full 22, so we chose not to renew our existing contract with her. And so, to get her back for the 13 or 14 that we wanted, we had to make a new deal, and she declined."]
What was your understanding as to why she didn’t want to come back? It seems strange that she refused to return in any capacity. Doesn’t it seem strange to you?
Olmstead: It looked like a pretty good deal on the face of it. We definitely came up in money. Thirteen episodes would have allowed the character to have a proper exit. We were willing to push the start date back [to accommodate her maternity leave], which would have meant her coming in [around] Episode 10, but that wasn’t accepted. So then we offered to come up [to Canada] before she gave birth and film at her house. Pretty good money and she wouldn’t even have to leave her house. That wasn’t accepted. So it was a little curious to me and to others why she was taking such a hard stance. [Maybe] she felt that she was made certain assurances about being part of the show this season. And in fairness to her, those assurances were given, because she was such a valuable member of the show…. Also, she’s up [in Canada]. She’s comfortable. She’s starting a family. Maybe she didn’t want to have to fly down and have to do this stuff. Or maybe she felt like she wanted to be part of the show [full time], not just half the season. Perhaps she felt a little jilted. Our [original] plan was to definitely keep her for [all of] Season 3, but after a couple of times of getting it kicked back from the network, we had to come up with a new idea and that necessitated her character being killed.
Did you ever get an inkling that she wasn’t happy working on the show?
Olmstead: No. I’ve worked in TV for 10 years. I’ve been around difficult actors. I’ve definitely been around malcontents. She was none of those. Great actress. Very smart. Good suggestions. And an asset to the show.Sarah was recently quoted in a French magazine saying that she was “sad,” “shocked” and felt “deceived” by the decision to kill off the character. Presuming this is what she actually said, does this surprise you?
Olmstead: Not really. She was invested in the character and wanted to be a part of the show. We felt the same way.
Let’s discuss the way you killed her off. Some might view it as you guys exacting revenge on Sarah for not returning.
Olmstead: We really had no way of using her image other than the existing images that we had. Those Polaroids we used are old wardrobe shots from Season 1 and 2. She didn’t give us any new photos. So [we had to devise a way to] kill her [and still] show a body…. Obviously she wasn’t going to fly down and be a DOA for us. We just wanted to go with the most dramatic way to do it, a way that you could do it and not need the actress. Also, what it does is it helps put teeth into the antagonist of the show, the Susan character. Because a lot of times with [villains], they’re constantly wagging their finger, “You better do this, you better do that or this is going to happen” and it becomes hollow after a while. So, this absolutely dramatizes that when Susan issues a cautionary to Lincoln and that goes unheeded, this is the result.
So Sarah’s refusal to return essentially limited how you could kill her?
Olmstead: Yeah, basically. Could you have seen a [body] double’s feet being shoved into a meat grinder? Sure. Could you see a wide shot of a female body being dumped in an ocean? Probably. But dramatically, this allowed us to get the most out of what little we had to work with…. We used her not coming back to our advantage. When the bomb finally drops for Michael — and he finds out that she has been killed — it’s an unbelievable sequence between him and Lincoln. And it really lays a huge motivation on him.
Response from Sarah Wayne Callies
Although Callies declined multiple interview requests, last Friday the actress sent me the following statement via her spokesperson.“As hard as we all tried, the Prison Break powers that be and I were unable to find a way to meet both the needs of the story and the needs of my family. We parted wishing each other well. I had a wonderful time working with the creative team and have a world of respect for all of them; they took great care of Dr. Sara. I’m also enormously grateful to the fans. They’ve been so gracious and supportive, and I hope they continue to enjoy the show.”
This really isn’t sounding great for Sarah Wayne Callies. As a new mom myself, I understand how much of a lifestyle change being a parent can be. It’s tough, and it’s wonderful, and it’s overwhelming. But it sounds like she burned some bridges in not being accommodating to the producers. And I wonder how upset her fan base (and all the MiSa fans) will be…
What do you think?
Source: Ausiello Report



1041 days ago
sorry but your pathetic its an action show 4 god sake
Reply
1038 days ago
Am i suppose to care about your comment? If i want to see a show for good sake i have the right for.
Reply
1037 days ago
first off what would you stephanie know about proffesionalsm my guess is probably not a lot how old r u 14 or something secondry they did finish what they started it started with sara an micheal and finished with sara’s head in a box and finally yeah bellick is more interesting than sara mind you your probably to stupid to work out why he is yeah lets have a collective suicide that would be good wouldnt it dumb ass
Reply
1037 days ago
First, i’m not 14 years old and second i never said you were stupid or a big ass hole because you don’t think the same thing of me KONVICT. I’m right to think that Bellick is dool and you’re right to think is super important to the show. I do think a lot about professionnalism to think that killing everyone it’s not at all. So with all of my RESPECT (something you don’t really seem to have AND maybe i’m the one who should ask for your age by the way because the way you just gave me shitt without knowing me iT’s not really mature) i will tell you to continue to pretend that this crap is professionnal and on my side i will continue to think that is not. END
Reply
1037 days ago
Oh and the collective suicide was kind of sacarstic if you didn’t get it.
Reply
1037 days ago
KONVICT, leave this stephanie girl alone (im assuming you’re a girl) everybody is allowed to say what they think, just because you didnt like sara, doesnt mean other people agree with you
BACK OFF
Reply
1037 days ago
Exactly :-) Thank you Kristen
Reply
1036 days ago
Hey, ok producers can make the story the way they want but they should think about what the audience wants to see. All those agreed about killing Sarah, i dont know what to say to them. Majority of people now hates Prison break just becuase of Sara’s death. All these people who didnt mind Sara’s death, what would you think if
1. Tom Cruise died in the end of his action movies?
2. What if Paul died at the end of the 2 Fast 2 Furious, yeah something like that?
3. What if Angelina died in the middle of the Tomb Raider and then a another punk and comes and continue the treasure finding?
4. What if Jackie Chan died at the end of his movies?
5. Take any love story you want and think about it?
Punks!!
Reply
1035 days ago
u back off biatch.sanjay how can u compare tom cruise dieing on top gun or mi2 or something like that 2 swc’s untimely demise i would think about what you post b4 u post it i see swc as a goose rather than a mavrick
Reply
1035 days ago
Konvict-
Please stop typing with your tongue. Their point is how would you like it if they killed one of ,if not the, lead character that many people are tuning in for? Killing her was dumb and the only reason they did it is to introduce a new gal for Michael- then get her own spinoff. Now PB can die it’s death as far as many of us are concerned.
Reply
1035 days ago
your missing the point dick head check the credits at the start of every episode they say and sara wayne callis so she was probably gonna die any way i just cant stand all the moaning about it whats done is done but people like you my miss informed freind will either be proved wrong or end up loveing the show again but when that happpens you will probably change your user name my point is sara was a main carachter 4 seasons 1 and 2 not so much 4 this season so just get over it instead of blocking the boards with omg bring back sara take a good look in the mirror and ask your self do i realy want to miss out on what happens in season 3
Reply
1035 days ago
so take that biatch
Reply
1035 days ago
Hey kids,
Who really cares anymore. Give it a rest. This really isn’t worth all the name calling and bitching back and forth. I’m still watching the show. I’m disappointed that Sara is gone, but she wasn’t the only reason I watched it. It’s still a good show and hopefully the producers will keep it that way, even amongst all the back lash they’ve got from killing off Sara.
Peace and love people, peace and love!!!
Reply
1035 days ago
Guys – Sara was not a main character. MICHAEL is the main character. You can’t compare killing her to killing Tom Cruise in MI. This show is about, and has always been about, the two brothers. It is their show, not Sara’s.
Reply
1035 days ago
who has the highest kill count in prison break kellerman mahone or t bag
Reply
1032 days ago
Bravo for breaking up the conflict.. I reckon Kellerman.
Reply
1032 days ago
I think Sara. She killed us all!
Reply
1032 days ago
HEY EVERYBODY mr KONVICT over here thinks he owns the place!!! this is a blog to find out what happens next on this show, SO TAKE YOUR FOWL MOUTH SOMEWHERE ELSE ! ! AND STOP PAYING OTHER PPL OUT !!!!!! AND DONT TELL ME TO BACK OFF, YOU STARTED THIS !!!!
Reply
1027 days ago
So far, this series has been about the hope for the future. This way, the scriptwriters were able to avoid hugging and kissing for most of the time and focus on the evils of the world and whatnot. Now, that fiction is gone from the world, and MJ frankly does not inspire either my sympathy or any hope for the future, so that’s out. IMHO, they need to think of an another way to put a little sunlight back into the series. So that’s one issue: the light at the end of the tunnel.
When I saw Sarah’s head in that box I was apalled. My reaction was literally: “What the HELL are they going to do now? How will they provide Michael with motivation to do anything else?” And now they tell us: by inciting “Revenge” as the theme. Now, I don’t know about you, but Michael has never been EVIL. That’s what’s been keeping my interest these two years. He’s done all sorts of bad things, but he has never (at least as far as I can remember) killed. That’s where he drew the line. His morals are impecable: screw somebody only if they had crossed you or truly done something bad. And giving a guy like that “revenge” as the main motivator is just WRONG. So, that’s it for issue two: questionable motivation for the future.
Now, for the other part of my reaction: it was “Yes, at last authors who have enough balls to do something noone has anticipated being done this way. Kill off Sarah, and at the same time make hostage threats seem real. Very real. You don’t get much more real than killing off a crucial side-almost-main char. Just like that. Bang, slice off her head, put it in a box, never show anything else. That’s cruel. And rare. So, thank you Sarah’s actor, you just made this series very special indeed. It’s a demoraliser, I know, and Sarah will be sorely missed, but I think they played it out in the best possible way.
It leaves the issues 1 and 2 open, but hey, the scriptwriters were able to come up with a unique first season and a decent second season. They’ll sort the 3rd out. I have a little faith.
Atom
Reply
1027 days ago
Oh, and people… Please use punctuation and correct spelling? That’s the little dots and commas you have on your keyboard. I don’t care if it’s random, as long as it’s there.
Posts are nigh-impossible to read otherwise, at least for someone who’s not a native speaker of English.
Reply