Comments on: Hugh Laurie: The Emmy Judging Committee Got It Wrong

By: The Most Thoroughly Disappointing Three Days for a House Fan… : House is Right - House is Right from b5media

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:25:59 +0000

[...] Instead of writing it all over again, I’ll just refer back to my previous post from another disappointing Emmy Awards show to tell you how I really feel about it. [...]

By: Veronica

Veronica — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:11:19 +0000

I have never, and I mean never, done anything like this. But I watch the show and find Hugh the sexiest man EVER! I walk away from the TV with a WOW! I recently found out that we have somewhat of a mutual connections from a freind I just met from New Zealand. Just wanted you to know that I fing you soooo handsome!
I don’t mean to offend your wife either. I’m sure she already knows how lucky she is. You are also a great actor and I really enjoy the show. I’ll keep watching!

Veronica

By: Gin-E

Gin-E — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:42:47 +0000

Ewwwwwwwwwww! Is he really holding a heart?
I guess it’d be fun to throw one at someone.
Oh…maybe someone would…need ….it……
anyways……lol

HUGH LAURIE IS SO PERDY FULL!!!<3

By: sharkey

sharkey — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:52:42 +0000

Hollywood doesn’t like House, MD. It takes on all kinds of politically incorrect subject matter, including abortion—remember the episode when the baby’s hand grabbed House’s finger?—individual responsibility, a heavy emphasis on the possibility of there being a God, and a theme that people, for the most part are good, despite sometimes being silly and foolish. Hollywood has a much different world view. Abortion is always good, human beings are always bad, and there is no God…period/exclamation point; and any TV show that even slightly, (and slyly,) digresses from absolutes into possibilities, threatening the Hollywood world view, AND achieves great success, must be shunned. Given the big red letter “A.”

By: Lina

Lina — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:22:00 +0000

if the judges just give the prizes for new shows, then, then, they should have given House or Hugh one in the first season shouldn’t them? Why haven’t they done that? *thinking õo*

For what I have seen, when the shows have too many seasons, (two or more), the writing, starts to become less good as it was in the original plot, the original idea. It starts to become too much diferent and therefore, worse… I don’t know why, maybe lack of ideas or something, but that is what I have noticed over the years…

I’m not saying that, in House happened this, for me House, M.D. is one of the few shows is still as good as it was in the beggining… and this year there is lot of shows with good and original plot (perhaps because they are still in the first season?)…

Perhaps their second season wouldn’t be so good as this first… and in the next emmy Hugh will won the emmy…! \o\ xD

By: Elaine

Elaine — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:06:26 +0000

well… I missed the Emmy on the 20th but didn’t plan to watch it with out Hugh. yes, he’s still the best actor.
He sings very well too. Did anyone watch his preformance years ago? Go to youtube… Hugh is just great!

By: Clarissa

Clarissa — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:52:18 +0000

I absolutely agree. You take that less-talented creep Bryan Cranston, who, before his Emmy, was only known for Malcolm In the Middle??…and pull him off the show…someone else could be Bryan Cranston. No one else can replace Hugh Laurie. And this coming from a just-last-week fan of House. He totally deserved the win. And sure, it’s nice to say that he’s still the winner in our eyes even though he doesn’t have a statue. But it still remains that the stupid judges were definitely stoned or something, they were completely off their rockers whenever they decided that no-talent quack Cranston would beat out Hugh.
WE LOVE HUGH!

By: Bia

Bia — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:55:01 +0000

Where do I sign???? I could copy and paste everything you said to a million people. I got SO frustrated when his names wasn´t said.
THAT´S SOO UNFAIR!

By: Lynn

Lynn — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:45:34 +0000

Cheliozz:

That’s a very good point. I hadn’t considered that the awards mostly went to new programs. Hmmm…

Very interesting! Thanks for the perspective!

~~ Lynn

By: Cheliozz

Cheliozz — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:26:45 +0000

The Judges are just thinking in too commercial ways….maybe House didn’t get an emmy because of the changes from season 4….but this just shows that the emmys aren’t about giving prices to the best shows, in my opinion they are about giving prices (sry for the bad english) just to the NEW shows….in almost every category there were shows that were aired for the first time this year and….i dunno how to say, but i think the emmys just became a new way of promoting NEW shows and not honoring the BEST shows. My favourite shows….House, Prison Break, 24, Supernatural….they all won prices as long as they were new or didn’t change the way of the episodes (I hope you understand what i mean)…but for me it seems like the jury of the emmys doesn’t even WANT to recognize the way a show HAS to be changing…