David Boreanaz & Emily Deschanel Don't Get Along??

I am sorry, but if you’re not convinced you should have titled this differently.
Anyone who listened to DB’s radio interview, seen his TV appearances (just to keep it confined at that week, in UK) knows that the opposite is very much the case. Here’s a humorless interviewer who wants to pay back because his Angel questions were not considered and injects his perception with the acrimony he feels. Starting with “Grumpy Dave”

Reply

i don’t think that this article is right, in fact i think this is the unique time in 3 years that I read about it. No, no no.

Reply

ahah! what the h**? the reporter was mad at david or what?

Reply

I think it’s more of a brother/sister type of relationship where they tease each other and get on each other’s nerves a lot on purpose. Frankly, I doubt two people who work so many hours together would get along ALL the time. I thought the article was kind of amusing…sounds just like Booth and Brennan.

Reply

One more thing – as I just realized you weren’t featuring the interview but a digital spy take on it.
I don’t know why the writer from this site has such fury against DB – but I recall their name because I always read outrageous personal attacks (of the variety – “Angel the series was great, but DB was terrible”)
His kind seemed quiet for a while but came out of the woodworks lately.

Reply

Major Gossip. Major lie. Little true. ;)
Who knows DB&ED’s relationship, knows that they get along just fine (really fine). And there’s an interview that Emily gave to the View once, if I’m not in mistake, where she said that she’s opinionated – well, something really similar to what David said ;). Media LOOOVES to twist words..

Reply

I just think “fairness” is a poor excuse – especially as you don’t post any direct DB words – unfiltered by people who don’t like him.
As for “disclosure” – it’s usually reserved for relevant facts (true) that may cast a different light on the story itself – so I don’t see any “interest of disclosure” here.

Reply

OK, I think that with this my disrespect for the species called “journalists” (particularly the online ones) has reached its utmost depth.

Here is the FULL part of the interview on Metro
on the DB&ED relationship:

“What’s it like doing all your scenes with co-star Emily Deschanel?
It’s a lot of work because we’re in every scene together, but that’s what drives the characters. I like that. It enhances the chemistry.

Do you get sick of the sight of each other?
Oh, yeah. We drive each other crazy and tell each other so. There are days when we show up and don’t get on too well, but we use it in the scenes.

How do you annoy each other?
I’m constantly poking her shoulder and getting under her skin. I think it’s part of my job. She’s very opinionated. I could be talking to a director or producer and she’ll put her two cents in. It’s annoying and I’ve told her about it, but she keeps on doing it.”

I don’t know about you, but what I read here is “We work together a LOT and YES, sometimes our days together start with the wrong foot, and YES we do argue and disagree sometimes (imagine the sometimes italics and underlined , I don’t have thoese font features here)”, but the fact that they used it in the scenes when B&B have to fight (as David immediately points out) does prove that theirs is not a Montague-Capulet-like feud, as Digital Spy (what a f***k name for a E-magazine who manipulates information at its own ease) wants us to believe.
As charachters, B&B love each other in a very deep way: I do not think that any actor could fake looks of love and affection if they hated the person in front of them to bits.

What I think may have pissed the Digital Spy report off is probably this quote of David’s in the same Metro interview:

“I was amazed by how delusional you guys were, thinking that Hatton had a chance against Mayweather”

I was in England in the days before and after the match, and I watched on telly how hopefull the British sport journalists and Hutton’s supporters rightly were. Even though everybody is entitled to both having and expreessing their opinion (especially in “lighter” matters such as sports), when you lose in an international sports event it is really hard to take any comments about it 8I support A.C. Milan and I still remember that when we lost the Champions Cup Final to Liverpool at penalties after leasing the game in the first half 3-0 we supporters were a little touchy on the subject for a very long time).

Reply

I can imagine DB and ED arguing and disagreeing every once in a while, like siblings. They’re together several hours a day and on weekends when the practice their “effortless” sizzle with a coach. But this article contradicts every written and live interview I read or seen with these two, as well as what I saw with my own eyes when I saw the pair together at Comic Con a couple years ago. They got along great.

Reply

Since you edited my post taking out the link to my references (still linked to my handle), I need to add the disclosure element re: digital spy person. he/she wrote a whole review praising “Angel” but starting with:

“Angel took David Boreanaz’s troubled blood-sucker from Buffy and gave the actor a chance to expand on his dubious repertoire of two facial expressions (sad and angry)”

I remember that person because in the past he went out of his/her way to malign DB even when not writing about Angel, Buffy or Bones. Just for kicks. So, judge this person credibility for yourselves.
Me, I still have to wonder why my website is taboo here, so is the BBC radio interview DB gave the same week and the videos of his appearances. How is some hateful hack from digital spy more legit than BBC radio? Why is a comment on a tabloid interview more worthy of being featured here than DB’s direct words on the radio?

Reply