<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSI is whack, stupid and lacks chemistry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/</link>
	<description>Sports and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: i love csi:ny</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-205011</link>
		<dc:creator>i love csi:ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2007/07/28/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/#comment-205011</guid>
		<description>By the way, number #6 has nothing to do with the CSI: shows. I know that I&#039;m writing this way after the comment was put up, but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, number #6 has nothing to do with the CSI: shows. I know that I&#8217;m writing this way after the comment was put up, but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i love csi:ny</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/comment-page-1/#comment-204524</link>
		<dc:creator>i love csi:ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2007/07/28/csi-is-whack-stupid-and-lacks-chemistry/#comment-204524</guid>
		<description>After reading this, I am a little astonished. These shows are so loved but we don&#039;t think about those few people out there that don&#039;t like them. While I agree that it was hard in the beginning to watch these shows, after seven years of being on the air, you start to understand. And the people on the show have to explain the procedures because how the heck are we supposed to know what some big machine does? And since this is a 45-60 minute show, they have to make the evidence easy to find because they don&#039;t have that long to solve the murder. They have to get along with the show. And as for the writing, CSI: Miami is the worst. Horatio, I love you, but the oneliners are more comedic than threatening. Now, I&#039;ve never seen Bones, because I keep my eyes amongst the ranks of crime dramas on CBS (can you say obsessed?), but I am sure that it has some similar aspects of CSI:, CSI: Miami, and CSI: NY. And even if someone called these shows lacking in chemestry, they don&#039;t lack great ratings by Nielsen and fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this, I am a little astonished. These shows are so loved but we don&#8217;t think about those few people out there that don&#8217;t like them. While I agree that it was hard in the beginning to watch these shows, after seven years of being on the air, you start to understand. And the people on the show have to explain the procedures because how the heck are we supposed to know what some big machine does? And since this is a 45-60 minute show, they have to make the evidence easy to find because they don&#8217;t have that long to solve the murder. They have to get along with the show. And as for the writing, CSI: Miami is the worst. Horatio, I love you, but the oneliners are more comedic than threatening. Now, I&#8217;ve never seen Bones, because I keep my eyes amongst the ranks of crime dramas on CBS (can you say obsessed?), but I am sure that it has some similar aspects of CSI:, CSI: Miami, and CSI: NY. And even if someone called these shows lacking in chemestry, they don&#8217;t lack great ratings by Nielsen and fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

