<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24 &#8211; Episode 8.06 &#8211; 9:00PM &#8211; 10:00PM &#8211; Promo Pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/24-episode-8-06-900pm-1000pm-promo-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/24-episode-8-06-900pm-1000pm-promo-pictures/</link>
	<description>Sports and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy</title>
		<link>http://everyjoe.com/entertainment/24-episode-8-06-900pm-1000pm-promo-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-211732</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://24headquarters.com/?p=1702#comment-211732</guid>
		<description>The show is great, but I cannot understand why Jack is pronouncing &quot;nuclear&quot; incorrectly. Is the show trying to reel in bozos on the Right or something? What the heck is up? Even Peter Griffin knows not to say &quot;nucular&quot;!!!!!!!! Maybe Bush will watch the show now. Is that what we&#039;re going for here? I sure wish someone would address this. It&#039;s a MAJOR FLAW. I can&#039;t help but think it&#039;s intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The show is great, but I cannot understand why Jack is pronouncing &#8220;nuclear&#8221; incorrectly. Is the show trying to reel in bozos on the Right or something? What the heck is up? Even Peter Griffin knows not to say &#8220;nucular&#8221;!!!!!!!! Maybe Bush will watch the show now. Is that what we&#8217;re going for here? I sure wish someone would address this. It&#8217;s a MAJOR FLAW. I can&#8217;t help but think it&#8217;s intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

